Coronavirus and its implications for emergency board powers

Filed Under: Discussion

As is typical when the law changes or an unexpected event arises, it doesn’t take long for the issue to impact one of our firm’s clients in a direct and material way. The current coronavirus pandemic has had an immediate impact on all of us, including community associations.

Overnight, the way we socialize and interact with one another has been irretrievably impacted while nature and science find a conclusion to this horrible circumstance. The real-life impact includes the potential need to take action on an immediate basis by community associations, including the conduct of Board and Membership meetings. This has led to immediate and difficult questions concerning the Board’s authority to alter the conduct and notice of its Board and Membership meetings, in addition to access to the Association’s recreational and other facilities. Can the Association conduct Board and Membership meetings by digital or electronic means? Must the Association close a community recreational facility? Can it face liability should it fail or refuse to do so? These and many other questions must be met head on with little or no guidance to lead the Board’s decisions.

Thankfully, Florida law does provide at least some recognition to difficult circumstances and the need to potentially make exceptions with respect to access to meetings, the conduct of meetings and elections, and the right of every homeowner to utilize and enjoy the common facilities. Chapters 718 (F.S. 718.1265) and 720 (F.S. 720.316) specifically address Association emergency powers where a state of emergency has been declared pursuant to s. 252.36, Florida Statutes “in response to damage caused by an event for which a state of emergency…” has been declared. The powers include the power to conduct Board meetings and Membership meetings without strict adherence to notice requirements, canceling and rescheduling meetings, and making portions of the community unavailable for entry or occupancy based upon the advice of emergency management officials or licensed professionals.

Rescheduling meetings or conducting them by alternate means are likely to be reasonable implementations of Board emergency powers. Deadlines in the governing documents or state statutes for action are a bit more difficult to navigate in these uncertain times. Where the documents or the statute require action within a certain timeframe (i.e., 30 days to reply to an ARB application or 60 days to address an item identified by Petition of homeowners), it will likely be necessary for the Board to explore options to conduct the meeting by alternative means. A Board or ARB Meeting can be conducted telephonically or by videoconference. If this option is not available to the Association without significant expense or equipment upgrades, providing notice to the homeowners of a time-certain delay in the meeting or decision of the ARB may be a viable option. For example, homeowners with pending ARB applications may be notified that the ARB will either meet to address their application or approve it within a time certain which is beyond the deadline but within a reasonable period of time (i.e., 30 to 45 days).

A novel crisis like Covid-19 and its current impacts will inevitably lead to novel and imperfect solutions. I believe the Board’s primary and perhaps only obligation is to act in good faith with the best interests of the community in mind and explore all viable options when met with deadlines or the need to conduct meetings safely. Provided the Board conducts a reasonable investigation into its alternatives, the ultimate decision is less likely to be questioned.
As always, work closely with your Association counsel to guide the Board through this most difficult of times.